Online Books Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Download Free

List About Books Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

Title	:	Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
Author	:	Immanuel Kant
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	First Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 120 pages
Published	:	April 28th 1998 by Cambridge University Press (first published 1785)
Categories	:	Philosophy. Nonfiction. Classics. European Literature. German Literature

Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

Immanuel Kant

Paperback | Pages: 120 pages

Rating: 3.83 | 15934 Users | 441 Reviews

Chronicle During Books Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

Immanuel Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals ranks alongside Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics as one of the most profound and influential works in moral philosophy ever written. In Kant's own words its aim is to search for and establish the supreme principle of morality, the categorical imperative. This edition presents the acclaimed translation of the text by Mary Gregor, together with an introduction by Christine M. Korsgaard that examines and explains Kant's argument.

Point Books Conducive To Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

Original Title:	Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten
ISBN:	0521626951 (ISBN13: 9780521626958)
Edition Language:	English URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant

Rating About Books Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

Ratings: 3.83 From 15934 Users | 441 Reviews

Commentary About Books Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

This was flummoxing (or mind-fucking, if you wish) to say the least, such abstract and abstruse philosophical thought made me have to go back and forth constantly. From what I've extracted from this book, the kernel idea that Kant wishes to convey is the glorious Categorical Imperative.What the Categorical Imperative suggests is the following:"Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law. " In other words, "do unto your neighbors

I really liked the book, despite having been kind of an anti-Kantian for a long time prior to reading it. Deontological ethics are the worst ethics, I'd always echoed someone or other be it Nietzsche or some other text but now after reading the actual work (although I do recognize that it feels rushed and underdeveloped philosophically at times) I've changed my mind. I wouldn't call myself a deontologist or anything but I do hold that the doctrine contains an important kernel or nugget of



It's probably a product of having been in grad school for too long, but somehow I found myself really liking this piece. I don't even care that it's not applicable to real life, at least his methods are based on tying human action to univsersal principles that anyone can participate in instead of trying to create this really creepy classist/elitist system of morality which the ancient greeks oozed over. And unlike the clunky, inhuman ethical systems espoused by more anylitic thinkers, Kant is at

I was the annoying guy in class who kept insisting that the categorical imperative was the Golden Rule with a thick, convoluted veneer of the most difficult writing in philosophical history slathered all over it. Of course it is slightly different than the Golden Rule, but I'd say only trivially so. I understand Kant's influence, importance, etc, I just can't stand his writing. And I do think that his ideas, as influential as they were, were often failures. And again, the writing is painfully

I understood about 10% but liked what I've read 10/10

Covid-19 is first and foremost a social disease. If we ever needed an example of Kant's categorical imperative, Covid-19 is the best we could find. Remember that Kant distinguishes between hypothetical and categoricaI imperatives. Examples of the former include: if I want to lose weight, I need to go on a diet. 'If I want to win the next general election, I need to...(complete as necessary)'. In other words, going on a diet is not good in itself, but is only good if one wants/needs to lose